A lesson I
am learning from contemporary physics and astronomy is: instead of looking at
the history of the universe as a series of events that led to us, we should
look at it the other way round. Because we are here, the universe has the
history that it does. Semantics? Not quite. Our “normal” way of looking at
history is: “A caused B to happen, which caused C to happen, etc, etc.” Another way to look at history is to say that
because current events exist the way that they do, then history must have
followed a series of events that led to their existence.
Try it
again: while it may be true that in the 15th century the
illegitimate son of a street vender murdered a young woman who had been
“destined” to be the mother of a hero who conquered the world, the fact that
this “conquering” did not occur means that this hither-to unknown murder was
only one possible explanation for what followed. There is no way we can verify
that this specific event caused the non-outcome, or that some other seemingly
unrelated event was the “cause.” This is a problem with destiny. What is
destined is what actually occurred,
not what might have occurred. It is
like trying to prove a negative. So, no world conqueror means there is no cause
for no world conqueror, unless one wants to admit an infinite number of
alternative theories.
Another
example is the old science fiction conundrum: what if I went back in a time
machine and murdered my grandfather? What would happen? I submit that nothing would
happen. You are here now, so that means that you did not go back in a time
machine and kill your grandfather. If you had succeeded in that event, then you
would not be here and your grandfather would not have been murdered by you.
When you start multiplying negative numbers you have to be careful of which
side of zero you are on.
And that’s
essentially how quantum physics works. A photon moving from point A to point B
has an infinite number of possible paths that it could have followed to get
there. There are only degrees of probability as to which path was actually
followed; in other words: some choices are more likely than others—but that
does not completely eliminate all other possibilities. The fact that we are
here in the universe at this time means that an infinite number of other
possibilities, some more likely than others, did not happen in our universe. We are here; therefore when the
universe was 200 seconds old exactly the right proportions of hydrogen, helium,
and lithium atoms existed to enable our later existence. If there were not the
right proportions of those three primary elements at the right time in the
history of our universe then we would not be here to talk about it. We were not
caused by the right combination at
the right time because there are an almost infinite number of alternative
histories that could have been followed after that critical moment. Only one
path leads to us; all other paths lead to “not-us.”
The
conclusion is that because we are here, our universe has the history that it
does. Without us, it has an infinite number of alternative histories, separated
only by degrees of probability.
This is
actually a radical shift in thinking about history. The history of anything, I
might add. Our brains are hardwired to see causes and consequences. That is the
basis of the science and philosophy of the past 2500 years. We see something.
What caused it? What effect did it have? In this way of thinking, we need a
primary cause, because events can not be caused by nothing. So, we invent a god
or a “prime mover” to fill in the logical hole. But, if history is a series of
probabilities, then we do not need a primary event to get things going. We just
have to ask: what are the probabilities that something exists rather than
not-exists? Given an infinite number of possibilities, then eventually, no
matter how small the probability, something will exist.
Look at it
this way: if something can happen,
then it will happen (or has happened). Our universe is just one
of an infinite number of other probable universes.
No comments:
Post a Comment